Apple is three things - hardware, software and services. Sooner they realize that services cannot follow the model of hardware and software, better it would be customers. Platform lock-in for software (like iMessages) makes sense. Why they don’t have a native app for Android for their services (like Apple TV+) is beyond me.
Tech
Yep. I know first hand now, that’s just plain weird đ¤Śđ˝ââď¸
Gruber says, and many have observed the same.
The iPhone 13 Mini has longer battery life than last yearâs regular iPhone 12. Thatâs a game-changer for those who want the Mini size.
Yep, it makes the mini iPhone a lot more appealing.
I joined Literal yesterday â I am @amit there. I also have three invites to share. So, if you are tired of Goodreads or just want a new service to play with, please use the share link.
I love the 120-Hz display. Because I can then read the text while scrolling.
A comment from one of the iPhone 13 reviews. Sigh, levels we will go to justify the trivial upgrades in gadgets.
Austin Mannâs reviews of iPhone cameras are absolutely brilliant each year. And this yearâs one for iPhone 13 Pro is no different. All shots are gorgeous. Even the video shot completely on iPhone is stunning. These devices are smartphones, no longer. These are âsmartcamerasâ.
I believe I donât know how to use a browser. There are just so many features in every browser that make no sense to me. And the list keeps getting growing. Tab pinning. Tab Groups. Tab Management. Reading Lists. Password Managers. Reading Lists. I use none.
Apple and other companies need to stop delivering these pre-recorded overproduced keynotes. Without live demos and hands-on reports, they are no longer mediums to introduce their gadgets. They simply are extended advertisements, or short films featuring devices in lead roles and executives in supporting roles.
The Atlantic is right, the Internet isnât dead. It is just crowded with more people who arenât living â literally and metaphorically. There are still people active on the Internet, they will keep it thriving. Let the non-living bots crowd the space, take over the corners that have been deserted. The folks with life will keep the oasis of the Internet busy, colourful.
Whyâs there a fascination among the devs to reinvent the old tech that isnât broken? Maybe the reason that the tech has stayed the same isnât because no one attempted to change it. Can you fathom the possibility that the tech might be fine, as it is, to most common folks? Or perhaps it might not be one of those things that most give a hoot about? Yeah?
The two prime examples I see many developers take a go at are browsers and email. Please, both work fine as they are. Donât try to reinvent them. They have reached a state in which they are open and standard enough already. Most people know the functionality they can expect while using it.
Stop reinventing it. Improve it, no doubt. Make it faster, simpler. Cleaner. But donât change the definition of what that tech represents. Donât mar the traits that make the tech great in the first place, universal accessibility.
Donât attach a lot of muck around the fundamentals of the accepted tech and call it â2.0â. I will suggest call it â1.0â of whatever the heck you want to name it.